define: Vibrancy

Posted February 4, 2013 by shaun in Art & Politics

This past week I got a kick out of Thomas Frank's article "Dead End on Shakin' Street" in the last issue of The Baffler. Frank skewers the term Vibrant, particularly as a meaningless buzzword used more recently by development groups when scheming on how to create the next Arts District...

“Corporations see a vibrant cultural landscape as a magnet for talent,” goes the thinking behind Kansas City’s vibrancy, according to one report; it’s “almost as vital for drawing good workers as more-traditional benefits like retirement plans and health insurance.” (Did you catch that, reader? Art is literally a substitute for compensating people properly. “Let them eat art,” indeed.)


good article, and good appropriate use of that gallery crawl flyer!

Posted by: mary at February 4, 2013 12:09 PM

Post a comment

« previous post | back to blog | next post »